At least it's obvious that ChatGPT is hopelessly biased.

Ini adalah berita terbaru dan menarik dengan judul At least it's obvious that ChatGPT is hopelessly biased.. Silahkan baca dan menyimak artikelnya.

The damage done to the credibility of AI by ChatGPT engineers building in political bias is irreparable. pic.twitter.com/s5fdoa8xQ6

— 🐺 (@LeighWolf) February 1, 2023

Uh, what?

We imagine it’ll be abused to shape false perceptions and change the outcome of elections by feeding millions of people lefty BS about a variety of political topics.

Way to play dumb though.

— 🐺 (@LeighWolf) February 1, 2023

For more discussion of this problem, see "ChatGPT’s creators can’t figure out why it won’t talk about Trump" (Semafor). What a terrible headline! Say only what you can know.

It should be more like: ChatGPT creators say they can't figure out why it won't talk about Trump.... 

That headline is part of the problem: participating in bias. And I don't know whether the Semafor headline writer knew the headline misstated what could be known or if this person didn't realize that the truth of the assertion couldn't be known.

The column is written by Reed Albergotti, who says:

[C]onservatives who criticize ChatGPT are making two distinct allegations: They’re suggesting that OpenAI employees have deliberately installed guardrails, such as the refusals to answer certain politically sensitive prompts. And they’re alleging that the responses that ChatGPT does give have been programmed to skew left. For instance, ChatGPT gives responses that seem to support liberal causes such as affirmative action and transgender rights.... 

[This criticism] reflects a misunderstanding about the way ChatGPT’s technology works at a fundamental level, and all the evidence points to unintentional bias, including its underlying dataset — that is, the internet.

All the evidence? 

ChatGPT is possible because computer scientists figured out how to essentially teach a software program to learn how to turn an incomprehensibly large amount of data into a knowledge base to compose an answer to almost every question. But a lot of the text out there on the internet was created by people who are bad at writing, grammar, and spelling. So OpenAI hired people to have conversations with the AI and grade its answers on how good they sounded. They weren’t judging it only on whether it was accurate, or whether it said the right thing. They wanted it to sound like a real person who can string together coherent sentences.

That doesn't account for refusing to list compliments to Trump in poem form. Albergotti suggests: 

Humans training the model would have downgraded incendiary responses, political and otherwise. The internet is filled with vitriol and offensive language that revolves around Trump, which may have triggered something the AI learned from other training that had nothing to do with the former president....

That's your idea, as you tell me that "all the evidence points to unintentional bias"? Absurd! 

Terima kasih karena telah membaca informasi tentang At least it's obvious that ChatGPT is hopelessly biased. . Silahkan membaca berita lainnya.