"Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained."

Ini adalah berita terbaru dan menarik dengan judul "Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained.". Silahkan baca dan menyimak artikelnya.
"The tweets claimed a police officer 'murdered' Michael Brown. But that’s not what investigators, including those from the Obama administration, concluded" (Vox).

Warren and Harris reiterated the protesters’ narrative in two separate tweets on the five-year anniversary of the shooting, using the moment to call for action against systemic racism and police violence....

The tweets expose the fine line that Warren, Harris, and others calling attention to police brutality have to walk. Individual police shootings and killings can and do help draw attention to genuine, broader issues surrounding police violence and systemic racism. But because the original narrative around the shootings can simply turn out to be wrong as we get more evidence, there’s a risk that attaching calls for reform too much to individual shootings and killings can backfire.

Fine line?! That's written as if Warren and Harris were speaking out right after the death, before the investigation. But they wrote this week — both calling it "murder" — 4 years after the investigation concluded that the killing was justified. They're not walking a fine line. They're crudely, clumsily groping for black voters. It's cynical, damaging, and patronizing.


Terima kasih karena telah membaca informasi tentang "Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris’s controversial Michael Brown tweets, explained." . Silahkan membaca berita lainnya.